data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04fc2/04fc21efa52dae398e0f8c22c432b6cba047a583" alt="Nba 2k14 next generation"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8232c/8232c2a82f917b9c3803b0a860f672b15ab830bc" alt="nba 2k14 next generation nba 2k14 next generation"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/176dc/176dcbbddb3855a7ba0339c6ff9e99fbe1e02c21" alt="nba 2k14 next generation nba 2k14 next generation"
Then it advised to treat objections to having sex with saying "OK" and then keeping going. Up to 95% I was at "Icky, but good points for the clueless target group I suppose". During that part, it's been a depressing read because it's tailored to average guys and I hate how this looks – tough talk, dumbing things down, dominance games. It also comes with good theory of interaction, by advocating to fix your relationship to yourself and then polarise people early. It kinda makes up for it by saying a couple of good things against PUA stuff (like advocating vulnerability, decent self-improvement progression etc).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e92/07e92f4137c1fb8fd1c97e521403c7076ab18ba9" alt="nba 2k14 next generation nba 2k14 next generation"
In that case, read my objection below and replace all "woman" with "person" and "women" with "people" so that the ridiculous parts stand out better.įor the most part, it has good and bad points: A lot of gross evopsych, think "women are evolved to", "As is often the case, women are terrible authorities on why they like/dislike something, all they know is that they like/dislike it". Do not read this book, except if you're not interested in dating women.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04fc2/04fc21efa52dae398e0f8c22c432b6cba047a583" alt="Nba 2k14 next generation"